Call Us: 630.229.3859

Email: info@rdsxray.com

Your Right to Choose:
Don't let Malvern PANalytical illegally restrict your service options

Your Right to Repair.

Don't let manufacturers dictate how you service your equipment. Know the facts.

Right to Repair News & Updates Below!

The OEM Sales Model vs. The RDS Partnership Approach

Assessments of a company's business practices can be subjective. However, a common criticism of the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) business model is that it prioritizes new equipment sales over the longevity of existing systems. OEMs are often motivated to sell new equipment, and their post-warranty service costs can spike to make purchasing new hardware seem like the only financially viable option. This focus on frequent, restrictive, and expensive hardware refresh cycles serves shareholder profits but often comes at the expense of customer satisfaction and value. From this perspective, large manufacturers like Malvern Panalytical may be seen as designing their service structures to maximize profit from new sales, letting customer satisfaction and pride in workmanship take a back seat.

At RDS, we offer a fundamentally different relationship. We are not just another vendor; we are your long-term service partner. Our entire business model is based on extending the life of your existing assets, reducing your Total Cost of Ownership (TCO), and freeing you from expensive OEM upgrade cycles. We succeed when you succeed by keeping your current equipment running optimally for as long as possible. We build partnerships, not just process transactions.

The Manufacturer's Playbook: How Your Rights Are Restricted

To protect their lucrative aftermarkets, OEMs employ a sophisticated playbook of anti-repair strategies designed to create a monopoly over the repair process.

  • Restricting Access to Resources: The most direct strategy is refusing to sell essential parts, tools, and service manuals to anyone outside their authorized dealer network. This creates a repair monopoly, enabling them to set artificially high prices.
  • Software Locks and Proprietary Keys:

    Rather than using complex component-matching systems, manufacturers like Malvern PANalytical deploy a more fundamental barrier: completely locked-down software. This strategy prevents labs from performing even the most basic maintenance and repairs, requiring proprietary software keys and specialty diagnostic tools that the OEM exclusively controls.

    This policy is so restrictive that Malvern Panalytical has even argued against providing customers with software keys for their own End-of-Life (EOL) systems equipment they no longer actively support. This leaves customers with two frustrating options: pay for an expensive and unnecessary upgrade or abandon a perfectly functional, paid-for instrument. At RDS, we reject this model. Our engineers have the deep expertise to navigate these artificial software roadblocks, providing the freedom to maintain and repair your equipment on your terms, not the manufacturer's. We empower you to extend the life of your assets, breaking you free from the OEM's forced upgrade cycle.

  • Misleading Warnings and Disparagement: Manufacturers use intimidating on-screen warnings to steer consumers away from independent repair. This can range from Apple's "unable to verify" messages to fake error messages used by companies like HP to obstruct third-party products.

Debunking OEM Myths with Facts, Legislation, and a Partnership Mindset

Manufacturers often justify their restrictions with claims about safety and security, but a landmark 2021 FTC report concluded there was "scant evidence to support manufacturers justifications for repair restrictions".

  • Myth: Using third-party parts or service voids your warranty.

    The Truth: This is legally prohibited by the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act of 1975. A manufacturer cannot condition a warranty on the use of a specific branded part or service unless it's provided for free. The burden of proof is on them to show that our service or parts *caused* the defect. As your partner, we stand behind our work and training.

  • Myth: Only OEM technicians have the expertise.

    The Truth: Our factory trained engineers often possess broader, multi-platform experience than OEM-specific technicians. In fact, some OEMs outsource their own field service to the very same third-party organizations that constitute the TPM market. We bring a wealth of diverse experience to solve your unique challenges.

  • Myth: You are locked into expensive OEM contracts and unnecessary purchases.

    The Truth: While OEMs are driven by new equipment sales, our focus is your long-term success. RDS is your trusted partner in maximizing the value of your current systems. We offer customer-centric, flexible contracts and only recommend what you genuinely need, helping you avoid unnecessary purchases and break free from OEM monopolies.

Legislative Momentum is on Your Side

The Right to Repair movement has achieved major victories. As of early 2025, bills had been introduced in all 50 states. Comprehensive laws have been enacted in states like New York, California, and Colorado, requiring OEMs to make parts, tools, and documentation available on "fair and reasonable terms". Oregon passed the nation's strongest law, which will ban the practice of parts pairing starting in 2025. This groundswell of state-level action is paving the way for a national standard, with the bipartisan Fair Repair Act aiming to establish a baseline for repair rights across the country.

The Right to Repair is about restoring balance and empowering you. At RDS, we are dedicated to being your trusted partner, providing the reliable, responsive, and cost-effective service you deserve. Choose a partnership that prioritizes your success, not just a sale.

Current News:

FTC Lawsuit Against John Deere Over 'Right to Repair' Moves Forward

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), joined by the attorneys general of Illinois and Minnesota, has filed a lawsuit against John Deere, alleging the company has engaged in an unlawful anti-competitive behavior. The core of the case revolves around the "right to repair" movement, asserting that John Deere's policies illegally restrict farmers and independent repair providers from being able to fix the company's agricultural equipment.

The complaint argues that John Deere has created a monopoly on the repair market for its tractors and other equipment by limiting access to essential diagnostic software and tools. This forces farmers to use John Deere's authorized dealer network for repairs, which the FTC claims results in inflated costs and significant delays during critical farming seasons. The lawsuit contends that this practice violates antitrust laws and harms farmers and independent businesses.

A significant development occurred when a federal judge denied John Deere's motion to dismiss the lawsuit. The ruling, issued in June 2025, allows the case to proceed toward a full trial. The judge rejected John Deere's arguments that the FTC lacked the constitutional authority to bring the case and that the claims were without merit. This decision is a major step forward for the plaintiffs and signals that the court believes there is sufficient legal basis for the case to be heard. The judge's ruling also noted that John Deere must face similar claims from a class-action lawsuit filed by farmers in 2022.

Key Documents and Links

State-by-State Victories: A Patchwork of Progress

The most significant progress has been at the state level. While specifics vary, new laws generally require manufacturers to provide owners and independent shops with fair access to parts, tools, and service information.

The Federal Push: The REPAIR Act